Archive for July, 2012

I’ve actually been kind of excited to see exactly how low Minitrue would go and if they would actually be bad enough for people who don’t really pay attention to notice.

We’re finding out, watching Journolist or whatever they’re calling themselves this year, go about their job of getting Obama re-coronated by writing coordinated Obama campaign ads under the guise of “News”.

They’re really pulling out all the stops for their God-President.

I’ve also been wondering what Romney would do. He can’t go as negative as a Dem as a matter of course or else he’d be attacked for it. If Romney could find footage of Obama singing “God Bless America” (a big if) and used it in an ad, the cries of “Questioning His Patriotism(TM)” would be deafening.

So Obama’s been hitting Romney on Bain and outsourcing jobs.

The Bain attacks on Romney have been less than useful.

A strong majority of Americans say Mitt Romney’s background in the private sector, including his management at the private equity firm he founded, Bain Capital, would help him make the right decisions on the economy.

So their push-poll backfired (you know they made sure to tell people about Obama’s ad when asking about “experience”). That’s pretty darn funny.

They failed even with the Journolist branch (Journolist is the only part of Minitrue I think is a conspiracy, the rest are just a consensus who go along they figure out what Journolist wants them to do) doing their best.

From July 10,

A few weeks ago, the Washington Post and the Obama campaign worked together to attack Governor Mitt Romney with proven lies about outsourcing

That was the Wash Post headline about “Romney’s Bain killed and ate orphans” or whatever, that the Wash Post then claimed didn’t tie Romney to the killing and eating of orphans, which story Obama is currently using in his ads now.

Worse, Romney has had the unmitigated gall to actually notice that Obama has sent many $billions  of our money overseas under the rubric of “Stimulus”.

Well, Minitrue can’t let that happen.

First, we’ll do a two-fer that’s truly funny.

From March 4, 2010, when senators were running for re-election not Obama, we have this story about the OUTRAGE! felt by these Dem senators at furriners being stimulized with ‘Murican’s money.  They need to act all American and shit to win re-election.

Senate Democrats lashed out at the Obama administration on Wednesday, saying its stimulus wind energy program creates jobs overseas instead of in the U.S., and they’re calling for the administration to put a stop to it.

Fast-forward to 2012, nowRomney is running ads hitting Obama on his outsourcing so it’s time to get Obama re-elected so he has to act American.

I personally would have an ad saying,

“My esteemed opponent in the upcoming has been saying I’d be bad for the economy because I outsourced. Well, my company took over other companies and spent the companies’ money and did what we had to do to make the company profitable under current laws. My opponent has taken US taxpayer money, claimed it was to make the company, the US, “profitable”. Instead he sent money overseas to study prostitutes in China. Meanwhile, his “company”, our great nation, has record deficits and high unemployment”.

But nobody listens to me.

To counter the ads Romney has been running, we have PolitFact, ready, willing and (differently) able(d).

Labeled “Mostly False” (which is what we used to call “true)

A TV ad running in eight states blames President Barack Obama for sending stimulus money overseas while Americans are out of work.

Heh.  I could full this whole page with nothing but PolitiFact links saying things are “Half-true” and other euphemisms for “True”, but you can just click around their cess-pit for yourself. It’s good for a laugh actually as they contort themselves into knots trying to say things could be “Misinterpreted” that way, but smart people(tm) know better.

This is a great link, chock full o’ facts about exactly where Obama outsourced our tax money. It’s from the Breitbart link above.
I’d say don’t click that unless you want to blog about something, otherwise you’ll just get really, really, angry and kick the dog. (mine’s hiding as I write).

So from the polls, we see Romney is winning the “Who knows how to run an economy and who outsourced more money” race.

Minitrue’s full force must be brought to bear.

Here we have  the Wash Post fresh from their tying Romney to the eating of orphans at a company when he didn’t work there.

They need to counter Romney’s ads and assure their (shrinking) readership that the forces of Good will prevail.

Romney’s ad (according to the Wash Post)

– Narration from Romney campaign ad

“Seventy-nine percent of the $2.1 billion in stimulus grants awarded through it went to overseas companies — $2.1 billion.”

— 2010 remarks from Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY), featured in Romney campaign ad

Okay so far.  How to handle this?

First, the set-up.  We need to set the stage that Romney is a serial liar.

We’ve covered most of these claims in the past, with each one receiving Pinocchios to one degree or another.

Zero is a degree.

Now to the attack.

Romney claims the Obama administration funneled stimulus money to friends, donors and campaign supporters

Wait, didn’t you just say Romney quotes Schumer attacking Obama about sending money overeas?

I see what you did there, you can’t counter those claims because they’re true so you’ll throw them in at the beginning, then go on to obfuscate about some other stuff, declare victory and we call go have cocktails and laugh and rage at the racists who don’t appreciate the magnificence that is Obama.
They run a few paragraphs about the attacks, with some key facts left out.

Beyond Solyndra, a February report from the Post revealed that the Department of Energy had awarded $3.9 billion in federal loans and financing to companies backed by firms with which Obama administration staffers and advisers had previously worked. None of the White House insiders had direct control over the federal funds, but e-mails show that they informally advocated for some of the businesses that received taxpayer money.

Notice the soft voice, “informally advocated”, nice adjective there.”Informally advocated”, in this instance, means, “Overrulled federal employees whose job it is to check things like this”.

This deal is NOT ready for prime time,” one White House budget analyst wrote in a March 10, 2009 email, nine days before the administration formally announced the loan.

If it had been Cheney, it would have been something about bullying them. They had no “direct control over” blah, blah, blah. That’s all about being hilarious considering the previous article whose headline directly tied Romney to Bain’s doing things when he didn’t work there.

Some more without too much editorializing.

This PolitiFactOhio link where they say that Romney’s ads talking about sending stimulus funds to a campaign supporter who spent the money in Finland is “False”, you know, except it’s true.

This hilarious, NY Times link, explaining that even though everything is true, in the aggregate it’s not.

This Roto-Reuters article is pretty darn good too. I absolutely love this quote.

Romney has sought to batter Obama over the stubbornly high U.S. unemployment rate and the weak economy, but instead has been forced in recent days to defend his business past, particularly his career as a private equity executive with Bain Capital

Yeah, those Bain Capital ads that, as we saw above, have actually raised Romney’s economic polls. While the whole article  is basically an Obama campaign ad, they have to make sure you understand that with their closing.

Obama has characterized the former Massachusetts governor and presumptive Republican White House nominee as a wealthy investor who is tied to Wall Street and corporate interests and is out of touch with ordinary Americans.

I’ve read the whole, 8 paragraph, article and I couldn’t figure out how it would have changed if it had been written by the Obama campaign.

This, mini-Minitrue outllet (CBS affiliate), has a good one.  Romney’s ad is “partially true but mostly false” (read: True).

I bring this one up because I wonder, did they just figure out what they were supposed to do or are on the Journolist mailing list?

As for Solyndra, the failed solar panel manufacturer from Fremont, Calif., was initially invited under the administration of President George W. Bush to apply for a government-guaranteed loan

An Obama approved message, they leave out how it was rejected by Bush’s people.  (From the above ABC article about Obama overruling the bureaucrats, page 2)

The results of the Congressional probe shared Tuesday with ABC News show that less than two weeks before President Bush left office, on January 9, 2009, the Energy Department’s credit committee made a unanimous decision not to offer a loan commitment to Solyndra.

Oh well, just a Congressional probe into the situation, no need to bother your readers with that.  It’s Bush’s Fault ™.

Since I’m bashing Minitrue, I should link this actual news story  from ABC about Romney’s ads. It just reports on what’s in the ad in a dry, factual tone and doesn’t editorialize or put in Obama-Approved Talking Points.

It’s an Honest to God news article on a political matter. Will wonders never cease?

Advertisements

*PING!*

Posted: July 26, 2012 by doubleplusundead in Random Crap

Okay, being the old schooler that I am I have a wood bat as backup for my boomstickery, but man I may have to give aluminum a second look, that is an incredibly satisfying sound.

Bold, decisive action required

Posted: July 24, 2012 by Sean M. in FAIL

A lot has been said about what needs to be done in the wake of the massacre in Colorado, but most people seem to be turning the same tired, old solutions, so here’s my (ahem) modest proposal: Starting immediately, every adult shall be sworn in as a police officer.

Think about it. If anybody is law-abiding, it’s cops, right? No more crime. Anywhere. And cops–as gun control advocates will tell you–are the only people with the proper firearms training, so if everyone is a cop, everyone will be able to carry a gun safely. Furthermore, cops are the kind of public sector employees that everyone (well, everyone who matters, anyway) agrees we need more of, so there goes the unemployment problem. And you’ll never have to mutter about how there’s never a cop around when you need one because there you are.

It’s really quite elegant in its simplicity.

(Okay, maybe not, but it’s no stupider than this.)

While we’ve been paying attention to Colorado and Syria, the rest of the world has been happily riding their handbasket to their ordained destiny.

(update: Click all links at your own risk. DPUD does not take responsibility for you clicking a website of our enemies, like the NY Times or Al Jazeera)

In EUnuchstan, Greece is still heavily boned.  Their economy is likely to shrink around 7% this year, according to their PM. Which means it’s likely to shrink more.

Spain’s borrowing at ridiculous rates.  Probably almost as much as Obama.

The bright spot in EUnuchstan is Serbia,  That’s where you go for sex change operations.  So if you really like sloppy vaginas, that’s where you can go to get your own.

As they say in “Blood Diamonds”, TIA. This is Africa. (Is anybody else positive that Jennifer Connelly went out and bought a diamond necklace after making that movie?)

Congo is still going through their civil war/murderous rampage/cannibalistic frenzy. At least now the UN is shooting back. I’d say that’s what happens when your opponents eat people.

al Quaeda is strengthening their hold on Nigeria.

Ghana’s elected president died, they’re not saying how. The VP was sworn in right away. In some countries I’d buy it at face value. In Africa? I wonder if the VP wasn’t happy about being second.

Egypt is taking time out from their planning on blowing up the pyramids to open the border with PLOistan….Gaza.  Hmmmm, I wonder if Israel could convince Egypt to take Gaza back? Eh, they probably shouldn’t. They’ll just have to take it back the next time Egypt tries to invade.

In Asian news, China is getting all frisky in the South China Sea and getting all belligerent with Vietnam, India and the Philippines.

They’ve built a nice, new city in a disputed region and are making noises about establishing a military presence in the Sudetenland…uhhhh…. Sansha (where they built the city they now ‘unexpectedly’ have to protect).

The Armenia/Azerbaijan, Karbakh deal is heating up a little more. “Never get involved in a land war in Asia” is hard to follow when you’re a mostly land-locked, Asian country.

In lighter news, North Korea is feeling all ignored.  Something, something, nuclear,  blah, blah, we’ll kill you all.

Yawn. The only people outside NoKo who care about the new, poofy-stomached maniac all live in Seoul.

Eh, depressing. Since I mentioned Jennifer Connelly, well, I have to put in some of her hottassery. It’s in the style guide. (more…)

Rumored PSU penalties too harsh

Posted: July 22, 2012 by socklessjoe in News

I’m seeing speculation online that the NCAA will be hitting the Penn State football program with a 5 to 7 year bowl suspension and reduced scholarships for 7 years. I also saw a separate report of a monetary fine in the tens of millions of dollars. This is too harsh.

Edit: 7/23, 9:30 pm ish: As everybody now knows, the penalties include a four year bowl ban, four year reduction in scholarships, a 60 million dollar fine, five years probation, and vacating of all wins going back through 1998.  I stand by my assessment that this is too harsh.

No, I’m not trying to be an apologist for those who would cover up child rape. Frankly, I think people like Jerry Sandusky ought to face the death penalty. You know, the real death penalty, where the government puts a permanent end to your oxygen consumption. As for the rest of them, the people who were involved in the coverup are either dead, in jail, or out of PSU and facing potential jail time of their own.

Basically, there’s nobody left at PSU to punish who was actually involved with the coverup.

A posthumously published letter supposedly written by Joe Paterno asserted that this scandal wasn’t about football. Well, it is to the extent that nobody covers up child rape for people who aren’t involved with important sports programs, but it really didn’t involve the operation of the program itself.

This reeks of a power-grab by the NCAA to assert its authority into an area outside its jurisdiction. By doing what it appears it will do Monday morning, the NCAA is punishing a whole lot of people who had nothing to do with Sandusky’s crimes while failing to punish anybody who actually DID have something to do with the coverup.

Those outside of the “Penn State community” – an amorphous term that describes not only the current students, faculty, and employees, but generations of alumni, and pretty much anybody living within a fifty mile radius of College Township – largely do not understand why some people are being defensive of the PSU football program and JoePa’s legacy. The football program has been popular for reasons other than winning, remaining reasonably popular even in lousy seasons. Joe Paterno –JoePa– should by all rights have been let go years ago, but was allowed to remain in large part because the community loved him. The football program itself was a largely clean program, and JoePa always emphasized the academic performance of team members, a pride validated by the academic statistics. JoePa was loved because the community saw him as a good and decent man. He was not just some son of a bitch who won football games by any means necessary, he was viewed as a throwback to a more noble and sportsmanlike era. That some continue to defend Paterno is largely a result of the incomprehensible incongruity between the JoePa persona and the Joe Paterno of the Freeh report.

The “culture” of the Penn State community is that people appreciated a clean program that performed reasonably well.  This is what the NCAA intends to punish.

To the extent that the NCAA wants to punish rabid college sports fandom, I think they might as well take the George Will position that multi-million dollar sports franchises have no business being attached to institutions of higher learning, and the NCAA ought to try to put itself out of business by eliminating college sports altogether.

(Note: I will not get an opportunity to update or edit this post for many hours after the official NCAA punishment is announced. Please comment accordingly.)

Addendum: 7/23, 9:30pm-ish: I basically stand by the observation that the NCAA is inflicting a lot of collateral damage against people who had nothing to do with this and really can’t punish those who did.  The vacating of wins strikes me as just plain silly, an arrogant and pathetic attempt to literally re-write history.

Gun Control: Paving the Road to Hell

Posted: July 21, 2012 by doubleplusundead in Op/Sped, This Is My BOOMSTICK!

So, I made my opinion known that I find this article regarding the recent tragedy in Aurora from the New Yorker vile, and it was suggested I make a response.  Done and done.  I’m going to try and keep my usual foulmouthedness and snark to a minimum in this post and offer a more serious, in-depth post explaining my views on gun control, and why I find the modern gun control movement abhorrent.  Much of this is old hat for my regular readers, as most of us are Evil Gun-Toting Maniacs (TM) to begin with, so feel free to tl;dr this and check out our other posts for our trademark snark and foulmouthedness, and maybe some hotassery.

First things first, the Second Amendment is an acknowledgment by our federal government of our essential, individual human right to self defense, full stop, there will be no deviation from that position, on ne passe pas.  Government does not grant us this right, because that would indicate that government can take this right from us, they can NEVER take this right from us, just as they cannot take the right to free speech away from us.  To argue otherwise is not only wrong, morally and intellectually, it is cruel.  It is NOT about militias or the state’s right to maintain arms, those rights have never been in question, every single one of the Amendments in the Bill of Rights are a recognition of natural rights for the individual, despite modern efforts by liberals to argue that somehow, as if by magic, that just the Second is for the state.

Of course the Supreme Court recently affirmed this and stated that the Second Amendment IS an individual right, as is the right to own a firearm in Heller.  Gopnik and the New Yorker crew can feel free to choke on that.

As most of my regular readers know, I have my degree in western history, as well as a strong background in political science.  With that sort of background, you become fixated on learning what something is, why it was designed the way it was, what came before it, what came after it, learning the what and why of that technology, and of course its broader role in history.  When I purchased my first firearm, I knew in my heart of hearts I’d end up with a full size .357 revolver (6″ S&W 686P, I love revolvers), but that didn’t stop me from learning about as much of the total history of individual firearms development as I could.  And I’m glad I did, it provides me with increased general knowledge, the means to argue against the gun control movement, and to show that even if they do have the best intentions in mind, their policies will inevitably be ineffective at best and a catalyst for greater human tragedy at worst.

So, what does my oddball fixation on having to know the full history of random crap I’m interested in at the time have to do with the gun control movement, and this New Yorker article?  I’ll explain, one of the things that gun control supporters or sympathizers often fail to understand or opt to ignore (whether that’s willful ignorance or malice) is that the basic technology of individual firearms (individual firearms being defined as a firearm that a single person can move, manipulate and fire on their own) is very mature technology, over 500 years old.  Sturm, Ruger & Co. are one of the largest firearm manufacturers in America, and have a very handy series of videos on Youtube that give a very brief basic overview of the major advances over the centuries in firearm technology, please utilize these videos in order to understand some of the terms I’m using here.  Firearms are machines and tools, just like there are terms one uses for parts or functions of a computer that we’ve all learned, so too are there such things for firearms, and these individual terms are significant.

Understand, the modern repeating firearm using self contained cartridges (bullet, powder, ignition source in a cartridge of some sort) has been around for over 150 years, and there were black powder muzzleloading (sort of) repeating firearms long before that. Semi-automatic rifles and handguns have been around for over 100 years.  The M1911 has been around for over 100 years now, and is STILL one of the most popular handguns in America.

Even the AR-15 and AK-47 are old hat, both are around 50 year old designs, modern polymer semi-auto pistols are not that far off from the 1911 seen above, they’ve just been simplified, larger magazines made and new polymers have been incorporated.  Gun control advocates and sympathizers need to understand this fundamental fact: firearms are really not that damned difficult to make, they’re not magic talismans, they’re not some blight or disease, they’re a machine, a tool that mankind has been making for half a millennium now.  Pandora’s box was opened long ago, and there’s no closing it.  There are hobbyists in America who manufacture firearms at home from almost every era of firearms development, up to and including major components of or entire AR-15s, some will use period correct tools and techniques, others will use modern tools and even small CNC machines.  Even if one only has access to things such as revolvers (single or double action), pump action shotguns and lever action or bolt action rifles, you can still fire and reload fairly quickly, it just takes a bit more work and practice.  If someone plans on doing something evil, and are determined to get access to a firearm, they’ll get it, or they’ll find another way to do the damage.

How easy is it to make a firearm?  Ever hear of the FP-45 Liberator?

What is that POS?  I hear you say.  The FP-45 was designed and manufactured by a branch of GM (yes, the auto manufacturer) during WWII.  Approximately 1 MILLION were manufactured by a small manufacturing plant in about three months.  Yes, but what was the Liberator?  It was a cheap, single shot hunk of junk made out of a small number of stamped steel parts, firing a .45 caliber pistol round out of a smoothbore barrel, so very inaccurate on top of being built out of cheap crap stamped steel parts.  It came in a small box with a few cartridges and a sheet of paper with instructions on how to load, unload and fire (you had to use a rod, pencil or stick to extract a spent cartridge).  Looks like a somebody grabbed a fistful of odds and ends from Lowes or Home Depot and cobbled ’em together, right?

The plan was to airdrop these FP-45s across Nazi-occupied parts of Europe, where resistance fighters could use them to ambush German soldiers in the streets, kill them and take their weapons to use against the Reich.  The OSS opted not to follow through and use them in Europe, we did however use some of them in Asia, China in particular.

Let that sink in, one MILLION guns, in THREE MONTHS, in a small manufacturing plant, in 1942, with 1942 technology.  And these weren’t gun people, these were people who were normally building auto parts.  Guns aren’t hard to make, you can find blueprints in books and online easily, any mouthbreather with a small workshop in his basement or garage, a set of instructions and a will to manufacture can make a serviceable, if crude firearm, then you have guys with more advanced stuff, including small CNC machines.  There were some pretty sophisticated clandestine gun making operations in IRA circles during The Troubles, building up to and including submachine guns.

That’s just manufacturing, but consider the logistic implications of the FP-45 too, we could have airdropped those damn things by the million if we wanted to in WWII.  Now think about the problem of drugs being smuggled into our ports and borders.  How many billions have we put into stopping the flow of narcotics, and how much success have we had in stopping the flow of said narcotics?  On another front, we now have, depending on who you ask, anywhere from 12 to 50 million illegal immigrants in the US right now.  We apparently can’t stop billions of dollars of illegal narcotics and millions of illegal immigrants from making their way into this country, what the HELL makes you think you’ll stop millions of guns and mountains of ammunition from getting in?  You won’t, and you can’t, or the illegal immigrant issue wouldn’t be an issue, and we’d be winning the farcical War on Drugs.  And that’s not even considering the fact that there are as many guns as there are people in the US, quite literally, there are approximately 300 MILLION firearms owned by the general public in America.

And, grim as this is to say, explosives are far more effective at killing large numbers of people.  We should be thankful that most of these psycho freaks grab a handgun before they grab a rifle, and a rifle before they build a bomb, and I don’t see Gopnik calling for the banning of petroleum, common household and industrial chemicals.

So, knowing how easy weapons are to make, move and procure, whether legal or not, who is actually effected the most by gun control measures?  Typically, it’ll be law abiding citizens, who are very much about keeping The Man out of their life, and do so by staying on his good side.  In essence, you’ve weakened the defensive capabilities of good people against the criminal element, against psycho freak aberrations like this guy in Aurora, and against governments, both foreign and domestic, who almost always either don’t care about the law, or they are the law, so to speak.  Is it a guarantee you’ll be able to make a successful defense against any such things?  No, of course not.  But is there anything benevolent about making a decent individual less able to defend themselves?  No, it’s actually pretty damned cruel.  That however can be hard for people to see when they’re reacting with emotion, not sitting back and applying logic and common sense to the situation, and lack historical perspective and knowledge on the subject.

As far as the scale of these tragedies, one should keep in mind that even the worst of these rampage style attacks is not nearly as common as individual criminal acts where a firearm is often used as both defense and deterrent, and absolutely pales in comparison to the kinds of massacres and atrocities inflicted on citizens by governments, both foreign and domestic.  The most obvious of these are course the Holocaust and German atrocities in WWII, but there are many others, the Armenian Genocide, the Soviet destruction of the Kulaks, The Great Purges, the Holodomor, the Soviet Gulag system, the Rape of Nanking and the millions of civilians the Japanese slaughtered and violated in China and elsewhere in WWII, all the atrocities committed and still being committed in North Korea by the Kim dynasty, the Khmer Rouge, Tienanmen Square, the Great Leap Forward, all the other atrocities committed by the Communist regime in China, Rwanda, Sudan, the Balkans, Saddam’s attacks on the Kurds, the Taliban’s general shitheadedness, the list is endless, and that’s just a bunch of the big ones over last 120 years.  I’ve rattled off a list, and we all say yeah yeah yeah, but Stalin was right in that we DO look at a million deaths like a statistic, but the reality is we should look at them as a million individual tragedies.  That is real horror right there.

So yes, I want to maintain my right to own a gun, up to and including AR and AK type rifles, odds aren’t in my favor if the government goes off the rails to begin with, but I want a sporting chance at dodging that cattle car ride.  And yes, our government is capable of doing vile things too, the two obvious ones being the upholding of the institution of slavery and the numerous wrongs committed against Native Americans.  Anyone who is ready to make the argument that our government can’t or won’t go off the rails again either lacks perspective or a respect for history, or are arrogant enough to believe that their ideology will prevent such from happening, or don’t care if it happens.

So, what about compromise?  How about no?  We’re winning the argument readily against the gun control movement and expanding our rights considerably, why the hell would we compromise with people we’re absolutely dominating, this would be like asking the Harlem Globetrotters to please not beat those poor Washington Generals again…sorry, it just doesn’t work that way.

On top of that, gun control advocates have proven to be dishonest players and untrustworthy opponents time and time again, visit any popular gun blog or read any NRA publications for an endless list of examples, also go to any pro gun control website, almost to a one they lock out opposing comments, delete opposing comments, or outright scrub their website of dissent, it has become a running joke amongst gunbloggers.  Needless to say, it doesn’t look good when you’re having to furiously delete dissenting comments of your legitimate opponents.  Those of us that accept the logic of the Second Amendment opt not to cooperate with groups such as the Brady Campaign and the VPC for this and many other reasons.

As for being libeled by Gopnik as part of what he calls the “blood lobby” and yes, I am part of what he calls the blood lobby, I support the NRA, and will continue to do so, he can feel free to get bent.  You want to know who is really, truly the most cold and indifferent to suffering in these events?  The media, people like Gopnik, they’re the blood lobby.  There’s a reason the line If It Bleeds, It Leads exists when talking of media.  Wanna know how I know?  We had a somewhat high profile shooting at my high school when I was a junior (no one killed, thankfully).  I wasn’t in the cafeteria where it happened, no, my younger sister had that privilege (it still disturbs me that my younger sister had to deal with that rather than myself).  I could however hear the shouting and screaming, I could hear the tables being tipped over by students to make cover/concealment.  Nothing quite like having to wonder if your sister was alive or not, or siblings of your classmates, I still get that queasy feeling I had at the time when I think about it.

The police were actually very good, very professional and had clearly prepared for such an event, in contrast to most of the school staff, who couldn’t have been worse if they tried.  We were separated by home room, checked by police behind a divider, a female officer checked female students, then escorted by other officers in small groups to a nearby sports bar/grill as a staging ground, and then taken by city bus to another location to be reunited with our families.  The sports bar had their bartenders and waitstaff bring out soda and water for students as we waited for the buses.  This sports bar has a wall of enormous TVs, usually playing different games, the tables have speakers and a dial to get sound for the game you’re following…like every other sports bar you’ve ever been to.  I gotta tell you, watching yourself and classmates being evac’d from your school live via chopper cam on CNN is a bit of a mindfuck.

So, okay, onto the buses we go, and we’re warned that the place is already crawling with media.  Sure enough, the short drive was littered with media types with cameras, and walking into the building to meet our families, the walkway was flanked on both sides by media types shoving cameras into our faces.  No regard for anyone or anything, including the landscaping.  None. And it didn’t end there, some students were followed home by media types, we happened to live near one of the guys from the local newspaper, so he was trying to get information and quotes (was promptly told to get lost).

My family, being fairly well known, got phone calls from the media, as did others, after calling family and a few other people, we actually disconnected the phone.  When we went back, the media was waiting too, snapping their cameras in your face as you went in and then published them, even if you asked them not to.  These shitheads hung around for a week…A WEEK…before they dissipated.  Media types love to pretend they’re sensitive and concerned about human tragedy, but it’s a lie, they are the most callous, intrusive shameless group of motherfuckers you’ll ever meet, right up there with slimy used car salesmen and ambulance chasers that advertise on late night TV.  So I’m not about to be libeled by Gopnik and the rest of the media and not respond.

Needless to say, I’m not indifferent, I’m not callous to this sort of event, though by no means was the event I experienced as bad as Aurora.  I have experience being in this sort of situation, and I don’t take well to Gopnik’s vague insinuation that those of us who recognize the Second Amendment says what it says, and does so for a clear logical reason are cold to this sort of tragedy.  Not at all, in fact, this is why many of us choose to exercise our right to self defense, this is why we have fought hard to expand our liberties and rights, to increase our chances of surviving, stopping or minimizing such tragedies.  We’re not glory-seekers, we just want to live in peace, and maybe shoot up some paper targets, break clays or go on a hunt for recreation, you know, enjoy life, which many buzzkills and nanny-staters want to make as dull as possible.  Any resistance to a rampage shooter can be quite effective.  Needless to say, given my background, I follow these sorts of events closely, and one of the characteristics of rampage shooters is that they almost always crumble at the first sign of violent resistance, whether that is by cop or by armed or sometimes unarmed citizens, obviously armed is going to be better.  This is not stated to encourage people to try and be heroes or whatever, that’s not my place, but rather a statement of fact, it is and should remain up to the individual to decide what action to take from there.

As for myself, this is why I choose to own firearms, this is why I will always own firearms, and this is why I’ll never surrender that right.

And I mean it.

43 Years Ago Today

Posted: July 20, 2012 by Edward von Bear in Brevity etc.

Yup, Americans fucking landed on the fucking moon and made it our fucking bitch. Let’s just hope this country still has a few great moments left in her. I still believe we can.