I opened this “New Post” with a link to the Hill with the intention of pointing out their blatant minitruism, it was going to be called “Minitrue Maladies Part The Billionth” or something like that.
That, short, article is about a court decision that the NSA warrantless wiretapping of all of America is unConstitutional. Which would appear obvious to me, but then, I don’t really like the Now we’re living in where words mean what the Dems and their political/media industrial complex say they mean.
So am I forcing things by saying this is subtle minitrueism?
The decision from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday represents the second major court victory for opponents of the NSA…,
It’s only a victory for opponents of the NSA? How about supporters of the Constitution and opponents of a 1984-style surveillance of everybody the NSA can reach? I can support the NSA while being against this surveillance-state tactic, can’t I?
…after a lower court decision called the program nearly (emphasis me V) unconstitutional six months ago.
See, it didn’t say “nearly”, it said “likely” as they should have known as they linked to their own story.
A federal judge on Monday ruled that the government’s collection of data on all U.S. phone calls is likely unconstitutional, (link in original V) comparing the National Security Agency (NSA) program to George Orwell’s1984.
An aside, this judge is obviously an unhelpful, recidivist who longs for the days of slavers as you can tell from the bit about 1984.
Notice the headline of the decision they link in that story
Klayman v. Obama
So it appears pretty obvious they are shilling for Obama and not the NSA.
And that’s how Minitrue works, tons of little things, they push they crap in every story in little ways,
From 2 years ago, in a story about some pols trying to take my guns, is this from my post
In Fuck You Minitrue News, a puppy blender link quoting The Hill. (I don’t link Minitrue if I can avoid it)
“A growing number of states are moving forward with legislation to exempt them from new federal gun controls and, in some cases, brand as criminals anyone who tries to enforce them. While many of the bills are considered symbolic or appear doomed to fail, the legislative explosion reflects a backlash against legislative and regulatory efforts in Washington to tamp down on gun violence.” (emphasis me V)
Fuck you, it’s not about reducing gun violence, it’s about control, it’s about making citizens into subjects and you assholes know it, you just keep pushing your fucking view at every chance.
It’s what they do. They put their spin in everything they do.
It appears to me to be to create a climate where their interpretation is the only civilized one and everybody who disagrees is misguided at best and evil at worst (nazi, fascist, racist, homophobe, misogynist, etc.).
But they’re totally not religious zealots.