Riffing off of Veeshir’s post,

So the only way we “shouldn’t have gone into Iraq or Afghanistan”  is if we have decided we’re going to be wimpy loser who hide under our beds when the bad men come out.

I think in the future we will need to weigh the difficulty and likely duration of any military task against the perseverance of the American voting public. Which is to say that we probably won’t be doing things that maybe we should, just because political reality will set in and we’ll bail out.

In a similar vein, I’d like to quote myself on what I termed the “inverse sunk cost fallacy” back in 2007:

Democrats might accuse the Bushies of committing the “sunk cost” fallacy with respect to the Iraq war, particularly not wanting lives already lost to have been lost “in vain”. However, Democrats seem to be committing the opposite fallacy. Dem Presidential candidates are falling over each other trying to get out of Iraq – “it’s not worth another life.”

Oh really? Not one more life? What if it was just one more life to make it all work out, then would it be worth it? What if it was 100, or 500? The Democrats seem to be saying that leaving behind a reasonably stable Iraq just isn’t worth anything at all, which it clearly is. Has it been worth 3000+ KIA’s? I suppose that’s a matter of perspective. Is it worth something? Absolutely.

Clearly Obama did not value what was left him.  He put no effort into a SOFA.  He put no effort into Sunni-Shia political reconciliation.  He allowed Maliki’s government to so abuse the Sunnis that many are running into the arms of the guys who Al Qaeda thought were a bit over-the-top.

Heckuva job, Barry.

Now watch this drive

  1. HayZeus says:

    Yep. Any lengthy/significant military task must be the idea of and supported by the MFM Democratic party (but I repeat myself) if said task is to have a good chance of success.

    • socklessjoe says:

      I would add to that, not merely initial support, but lasting support, which may prove illusory. Afghanistan, and to a lesser degree Iraq, had quite a bit of Dem support at first. These things will need to be gamed out and second guessed beforehand.

  2. veeshir says:

    Considering where we are, we need to change strageties.
    Since we can’t do anything that takes staying power, we need to embrace FrnakJ’s Nuke the Moon stragety.

    Bomb the crap out of a few countries and tell them to leave us and our allies alone because they really don’t want us coming back


    We’d have to do it a few times until people realize we mean it, then maybe we could get the world to leave us alone while they kill each other.

    That’s the best way to go from here but of course, we won’t do that either. We’ll just keep doing stupid stuff no matter who’s in charge. . .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s